The Himachal Pradesh High Court has issued notices to the Home Secretary and Director General of Police (DGP) in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the reinstatement of Mohammed Afroz as the Superintendent of Police (SP) in Baddi. The PIL claims that Afroz’s removal from the post was arbitrary and unwarranted, potentially affecting administrative efficiency and law enforcement in the region.
Afroz, known for his diligent service, was recently transferred from his position as Baddi SP under circumstances that have sparked public debate. Advocates of the PIL argue that his transfer may have been politically motivated and could disrupt ongoing efforts to curb crime and improve industrial safety in Baddi, a critical industrial hub in Himachal Pradesh.
Legal Grounds of the PIL
The petition asserts:
- Violation of Transfer Policy: Afroz’s reassignment allegedly contravenes established transfer guidelines.
- Impact on Governance: His removal could hinder initiatives aimed at reducing crime and bolstering public safety.
- Transparency Concerns: The PIL raises questions about the transparency of the decision-making process behind his transfer.
The High Court has directed the state’s Home Secretary and DGP to respond to the PIL. The bench has sought clarification on the rationale behind the transfer and whether due process was followed. The next hearing is scheduled for early January 2025.
The case has garnered significant attention, with many locals and members of the legal fraternity expressing support for Afroz. They cite his proactive policing and community engagement as critical to maintaining law and order in Baddi.
Government representatives have yet to comment officially on the matter. However, insiders suggest the transfer was routine and in line with administrative requirements. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for future disputes involving transfers of public officials and underscore the importance of adhering to transparent governance practices.